Cybertrauma: Third-sector, Membership bodies, Podcasts, Services and Organisations: ‘Awareness Raising’ Are there different rules?

This week in a webinar I heard a question about the mainstream media versus alternative sources of, let’s call it journalism, information sharing and live streaming as the source of what I call Cybertrauma. But what about those services not included here in this statement?

I have a question that I think is pertinent: Do the third-sector, membership bodies, podcasts and services have an ethical duty to not create trauma in the reader, listener or viewer?

What about those member-led, third-sector and organisational bodies that share information to the public that’s legal and harmful? Where is the ethical framework for this, given journalists are held to theirs and will be in the future through the online safety bill too?

Where do we draw the line about the sharing of information that contains descriptions of harmful behaviours and injury to human beings or animals? What about the contents of those informational pieces that are excessively descriptive, are written, informatics, or videos of the process of some crimes and how the event took place?

For example, the issues of Child sexual abuse, self-harm, suicide, terrorism, torture, abuse of sentient…